|
Inside
the Current Issue:







Comments
or questions about the site?:
advocate webmaster
The
current issue will be available online within 7 days of printed publication.
|
Defend
Ward Churchill and Academic Freedom
On February 3, the University of Colorado placed tenured Ethnic
Studies professor Ward Churchill, a radical scholar affiliated with
the American Indian Movement, under 30-day review – the first
legal step towards firing him. This move is the result of organizing
by a group of conservative students at Hamilton College in upstate
New York who objected to some of his views in his essay on 9/11
called “Some People Push Back: On the Justice of Roosting
Chickens.” In that piece Churchill compares the “technocrats”
of the finance and banking industry who were killed in the World
Trade Center to Adolf Eichmann, a Nazi bureaucrat who helped organize
the concentration camp system.
The essay, which can be found at the link below, has been widely
quoted out of context by the media. In particular, it is claimed
that Churchill included janitors, firefighters, medics and other
in his metaphor about Eichmann, which is not true. As the story
spread, he was forced to cancel a lecture – ironically at
a forum called “The Limits of Dissent – after receiving
death threats. Although he has stepped down as co-chair of his department,
he has refused to resign.
Churchill’s comments on 9/11 were meant to be inflammatory
and to encourage discussion about why the massacre occurred and
to suggest possible interpretations beyond the Bush Administration’s
“attack on freedom” model. To focus on the specifics
of what he said or wrote misses the point. The possibility of his
removal should concern all those involved in academic work for multiple
reasons:
1. Freedom of Speech: This is a basic First Amendment freedom of
speech issue. To lose one’s job over the use of metaphors
and hyperbole, especially in relation to discussion of an important
political issue, is state censorship.
2. Tenure and Academic Freedom: Churchill is a tenured professor,
and for him to be fired over such comments would be just the sort
of intellectual censorship the tenure system was designed to stop.
Many departments have written eloquent statements in support of
Churchill, such as this one from the Philosophy Department at his
own University of Colorado at Boulder:
“The recent controversy over Ward Churchill’s essay
should not obscure the fact that the precise purpose of the tenure
system is to secure the ability of university professors to argue
the most unpopular of cases, in the face of the most heated public
sentiment. We urge the Regents to honor that system in its consideration
of this case, and not to take any action that would threaten Professor
Churchill’s jobs or chill the free expression of thought that
is so vital within a university community.”
3. The Suppression of Dissent: This is a clear attempt to repress
voices critical of the current US mindset and policy. The Bush Administration
has cast 9/11 in black-and-white moral terms as a justification
for global war. If Churchill is removed because he offered an opposing
viewpoint – in the face of ironclad Constitutional and tenure
protections – it will set a terrible precedent, possibly harboring
the dawn of a new McCarthy era and the criminalization of dissent.
The governors of both Colorado and New York have publicly slandered
Churchill as being a supporter of terrorism. The Colorado governor
has called on him to resign, and the State House and Senate passed
a joint resolution condemning him. These actions are obviously intended
to put pressure on CU to remove Churchill, and the Board of Regents
has forced CU Interim Chancellor Phil DiStefano to initiate the
30-day review period. He will be assisted by two CU Deans, Todd
Gleeson and David Getches. When the 30 days are up, DifStefano will
determine whether to issue a notice of intent to dismiss for cause,
other action as appropriate, or no action, to the Regents. If a
notice to dismiss for cause or some other action is issued then
the subsequent process will be governed by
the Regents.
The Advocate calls on the Graduate Center community to support Ward
Churchill in the name of academic freedom. We urge our readers to
pressure Chancellor DiStefano and Deans Gleeson and Getches to do
the right thing.
Phil DiStefano chanchat@spot.colorado.edu
David Getches lawdean@colorado.edu
Todd Gleeson todd.gleeson@colorado.edu
|