Neither Occupation Nor Political Islam: A Secular, Democratic, and
Progressive Alternative in Iraq?
Robert Augman
After three years of war and occupation in Iraq, many Americans across
the political spectrum are having a difficult time finding a constructive
position. According to media reports, one would think there is only
a choice between two sides: you either support the U.S. occupation
and the Iraqi National Congress, or you support the armed groups opposing
them. For those who want to support the freedom of Iraqis, neither
side of this constructed conflict seems to be legitimately working
toward such a goal.
On the one side, the U.S. occupation has turned Iraqi society into
a war zone, which lacks the most basic forms of security and sustainability.
On the other side, the same is the case. On top of the chaos brought
about by the war and occupation, violent factions are making life
even more unbearable for ordinary Iraqis. Following mainstream media
reports - National Public Radio, independent media sources, and Left
media included - Iraq appears to be a society whose fate hangs in
the grips of these two competing sides. They seem to be the only recognizable
social actors. The future looks grim. It is with great inspiration,
therefore, that a secular, democratic, and progressive alternative
appears on the horizons.
Speaking to a small audience at The New School for Pluralistic Anti-Capitalist
Education (The New S.P.A.C.E.), on the Lower East Side, Houzan Mahmoud,
an Iraqi organizer and journalist told about Iraq's civil resistance
to U.S. occupation and political Islam. Mahmoud co-founded the Iraqi
Freedom Congress (IFC), a broad organization of progressive and civil
society groups. And she also co-founded The Organization of Women's
Freedom in Iraq (OWFI), a group working for equal rights and empowerment
of women.
"We are the opposition to power in Iraq. We're the third pole, the
alternative to the occupation and the so-called 'resistance,'" Mahmoud
said. "The IFC is trying to mobilize communities to defend themselves,
by building a democratic, secular, and progressive movement."
On March 8, The Organization for Women's Freedom mobilized nearly
1,000 people - mostly women - to an International Women's Day Rally
in Baghdad, in defiance of the curfew. The demonstration was to "support
female prisoners who've been tortured, raped, and denied their political
rights," Mahmoud explained. It was "to publicly oppose 'Honor Killings'
which legally allow women to be killed by men."
With demonstrations and grassroots support, they have influenced
policy and helped turn down Sharia Law, which Mahmoud says would have
meant forced marriage, no divorce rights, and other unjust policies.
The women's movement has also opened up women's shelters to protect
women from violence.
In addition to women's groups, the Iraqi Freedom Congress also includes
labor organizations. In opposition to the state-run labor organizations
controlled by the former Ba'athist regime of Saddam Hussein, which
weakened workers by criminalizing strikes and political activity,
organizations which are now being recreated by the Iraqi National
Congress with U.S. backing, independent worker's organizations have
been formed by worker's themselves. They formed The Federation of
Workers' Councils and Unions in Iraq, and The Union of Unemployed
in Iraq. These groups have been fundamental in fighting for rights,
and for improved living and working conditions. Mahmoud told of worker's
mobilizations that ejected occupying forces from an electrical facility
so that the workers could restore electricity to Iraqis.
Mahmoud argued stridently for a secular, democratic, and progressive
Iraq. Those who are angered by the collapse of Iraq ought to stop
lending tacit support to the occupying forces on the one hand, or
the political Islam groups on the other. Instead, it ought to lend
explicit support morally, politically, financially, or otherwise to
the civil resistance.
The Iraqi Freedom Congress is an open membership organization, open
not just to Iraqis, but to people in every country. "We want to mobilize
a civil resistance movement in Iraq and across the world," Mahmoud
argued, "If we can't have socialism, we'll at very least fight for
a secular, democratic, and egalitarian government. We are the alternative
in Iraq."
The event was co-organized by a new anti-war group, the National
Organization for the Iraqi Freedom Struggle (NO-IFS), which seeks
not only to oppose the war, but to make links with progressive movements
in Iraq. While the IFC has received support from groups in Japan,
France, and England, it is seeking support in the U.S. as well.
The position of NO-IFS, along with the IFC, is an immediate end to
the U.S. occupation. "Only then can Iraq decide on its own future,"
Mahmoud argued.
In the U.S., supporters of progressive politics at home and abroad
need to do more than present their opposition to the occupation. They
need to connect with progressive movements that can fill the vacuum,
and organize society differently. A progressive politics must be vocal
about its opposition not only to the occupation but also to political
Islam, which, according to Mahmoud, seeks to turn back the clock and
rule Iraq not according to people's needs, but according to oppressive
religious views.
Progressives in the U.S. ought to consider these social movements
working to build a secular, democratic, and progressive future in
Iraq, amidst the turmoil. While there's no question as to the ongoing
destruction the occupation is creating in Iraq, it is still a question
of how an immediate withdrawal of U.S. troops will help or harm these
social movements establish a progressive society. In the meantime,
supporters of Iraqi freedom could lend support to these movements,
revealing to the world that there is not just a choice between occupation
and political Islam. Alternatives exist, and they're worth fighting
for.
To learn more about the civil resistance in Iraq: