National
Public Radio’s Terry Gross: On Interviewing Technique, Public
Radio, and Fox News
Masha Rumer
“Hello, I’m Terry Gross and this is Fresh Air”
is a line familiar to millions of National
Public
Radio listeners. For over 20 years Terry Gross has been the host of
Fresh Air, an award-winning program produced by WHYY and featuring
interviews with the leading artistic, cultural, and political figures
of the day. What makes Fresh Air unique is the array of interesting
guests, Ms. Gross’s expansive knowledge of the topics, and her
uncanny ability to listen and ask questions that reveal, explain,
and inspire. Her book, “All I Did Was Ask,” was published
in 2004 by Hyperion, and brings together a collection of some of her
most memorable interviews with the likes of Johnny Cash, John Updike,
Sonny Rollins, Chris Rock, Uta Hagen, and even Kiss frontman Gene
Simmons.
On February 25, I spoke with Ms. Gross from the studios of WHYY in
Philadelphia.
MR: In your book, "All I Did Was Ask," you mention that
the media is often preoccupied with the dirty details of celebrities'
personal lives. How do you avoid this on Fresh Air and what do you
focus on? What’s important to you in an interview?
TG: I figure the reason why we’re interested in an actor, or
writer, or a musician in the first place is their work. We like their
work. It makes us laugh, it makes us feel something, we like the sensibility
of this person. So what I try to do in interviews is to discover what
shaped that sensibility that we love. If you’re an artist, you’re
born with a gift. But that gift is shaped by what happens to you,
it’s shaped by how your parents treated you, the neighborhood
you grew up in, what your school years were like, all that kind of
stuff. So I want to ask about that kind of stuff. And that requires
asking some personal questions, not intimate questions. Not questions
about who you’re sleeping with or a secret alcohol habit, or
anything like that, but just biographical questions. And, unfortunately,
people take these questions the wrong way, because they’re so
used to questions that are just leading to who they’re having
an affair with or if they have a secret drug problem. I’m not
heading there, but they don’t necessarily know that.
MR: What role does Fresh Air play in American culture?
TG: What we see as our mission in arts and entertainment is to call
people’s attention to some of the most interesting performers,
artists, and writers, some of the most interesting books, movies and
music, and world of issues. Part of our mission is to just stand back
and try to explain what’s going on, to get some of the smartest
and some of the most informed people in the country explain some of
the more complicated issues in the news.
MR: Does Fresh Air have a target audience?
TG: I don’t think of it that way. We tend to not think demographically.
Age-wise, our staff is really diverse—twenties through fifties.
So we have different generations represented within the staff, and
we generally try to go with what would we believe is interesting and
important, without thinking about the target audience. Though we do
assume that most of the people who listen to public radio have a fairly
high level of curiosity about the world around them and about the
arts and entertainment. And they want to hear things with more depth.
If you didn’t assume that, you’d be really wasting your
time.
MR: Back in January you came to the CUNY Graduate Center to speak
at the NY Times Arts & Leisure Weekend, along with James Lipton
of Inside the Actor's Studio. Mr. Lipton told a story about Jack Lemmon
coming onto his show and confessing that he was an alcoholic. Everybody
was shocked and there was a long pause in the studio, then Mr. Lipton
changed the subject. You asked Lipton at this point: "But why
didn't you ask about his alcoholism?" How does this incident
capture your approach to interviewing?
TG: You see, I might have done the same thing as he did. What he
meant was he thought Lemmon said all that he cared to say about it,
and that it was time to move on. And I had something similar happen
to me, where something surprises you, but you get the feeling that
this wouldn’t be the right moment to go further. So I wasn’t
suggesting that he should have pushed harder or should have asked
more. I just wanted to know why he decided not to.
MR: How do you keep your bias from interfering during your interviews?
TG: The show isn’t about my views and what I think, it’s
about getting people to express what they think.
MR: You speak with a variety of interesting people: musicians, writers,
actors, about their craft. Do you ever find yourself fantasizing,
what it would be like to have their job, to work in their field?
TG: Only in the sense that I try to imagine myself in their shoes
as an exercise to prepare for the interview, to get a feeling what
it’s like to do their work, to know what to ask them. But I
don’t fool myself into thinking that talking to actors, writers,
and musicians makes me an actor, writer, or a musician. So it’s
not like I’m there thinking or wishing I was in their shoes
or doing their work.
MR: Is there a difference in the way NPR brings the news as opposed
to, say, CNN or Fox News?
TG: I think NPR truly is fair and accurate. On NPR’s news programs,
like Morning Edition or All Things Considered, reporters get 45 minutes
to tell a story, they’re not crammed into 30 seconds or 60 seconds.
So you get a fuller and more complex picture of an issue by virtue
of that amount of time.
MR: Are there other reasons, aside from time limitations?
TG: Fox News is really largely interview programs. It’s not
really a news network per se. It’s mostly talk shows about the
news, so it’s a little difficult to compare. What Fox is doing
isn’t in any way like All Things Considered or Morning Edition.
It’s called a news network, but it’s really more of a
discussion network. I don’t mean that in a disparaging way,
I mean it’s not a series of reports. It’s mostly analysis,
commentary, pundits, interviews.
MR: During your famous interview with Bill O’Reilly, you were
discussing objectivity in certain news and talk show programs, whether
they seek to divide the population or to find answers. What is your
opinion?
TG: In general, I think that talk shows have become more partisan
than ever. The host tends to have the point of view as well as the
guest. Sometimes that sheds light on the information, and sometimes
it just adds to the confusion. I think that a lot of shows are about
generating controversy, as opposed to truly trying to present the
most fair and accurate information.
Masha Rumer is a student in the PhD program in Comparative Literature
and a freelance journalist.