BELFAST: A
CITY OF POLITICAL MURALS
by Paolo
Morisi
This summer I traveled to
Belfast during the month of July, when marching season was in full swing. I
wanted to visit the city and especially its painted murals, because in Northern
Ireland they represent an important means of cultural and political expression.
Murals can be found all over the city, but especially in the working-class
areas of West and North Belfast. Irish nationalists and Unionists both use the
murals to highlight their main political issues and to rally popular support
for their cause.
Murals first
appeared in the protestant working-class areas of Sandy Row and the Shankill in
the early part of the last century when unionists were fighting against the
incorporation of Northern Ireland into the Irish state. The unionist theme of
resistance resounds through these images, most often through the character of
King William III. The image of the king commemorates his victory in the Battle
of the Boyne on July 12 1690, in which he defeated his father-in-law, took
control of the English throne and initiated British rule in Ireland. Other
unionist murals depict the Union Jack, the Red Hand of Ulster and the flags of
Ulster proclaiming the loyalty of the region to the state and the union. In the
early part of the 20th century the unveiling of a new mural was a
community event in the protestant neighborhoods and was often conducted by a
local Ulster Unionist Party representative. Following the Anglo-Irish Agreement
of 1985, unionist murals reflected a new feeling of popular alienation from the
structures of the British state, but the main topic was still resistance to a
united Ireland. In the 1990s many unionist murals reflected the leftist
orientation of the emerging Progressive Unionist Party, which has had some
success in blending the unionist cause with working-class politics. For
instance, the Progressive Unionists support policy proposals such as the just
wage, more investment in struggling areas, better schools and job-training
schemes for young people, and their murals reflect the party’s social concerns.
Catholic and nationalist neighborhoods have
their own, more recent mural tradition, which dates to the 1981 hunger strike
carried out by Bobby Sands and other republican prisoners in appeal for
political prisoner status. The strike came at the end of a five-year campaign
during which republican prisoners, refusing to wear prison uniforms, were
clothed only in blankets or towels. When the nationalist candidate of the
Fermanagh/South Tyrone district died, Sinn Fein, the political wing of the
republican movement, put Sands up for election. The nationalist electorate
united to elect him to the Westminster parliament, hoping to save his life.
Bobby Sands was 27 years old when he died on the sixty-sixth day of his hunger
strike, May 5, 1981, just a few days after his election. He had spent the last
nine years of his life in prison because of his Irish Republican Army
activities. His memory is captured in the many murals that still can be found
in Belfast and other Northern Irish cities.
Despite the
tragedy of Sands’ fate, he might have been pleased by some of the unintended
consequences that came from it. Prior to 1981 republicans had either refused to
participate in elections in the North, or, if elected, had refused to take
their seats. But after Sands was elected to the British Parliament, Sinn Fein
decided that there was electoral support to be tapped. As they began to run
with great success in electoral contests, republicans developed a political
machine. Sinn Fein organized its mass base into local party organizations and
also created strong links with labor unions and local civic organizations. In
just a few years the party became a stable presence in local government, and in
many large towns it now runs the council government. At the national level,
Sinn Fein has been able to hold on to the West Belfast parliamentary seat at
Westminster since 1983.
The
long-term ramifications of Sinn Fein’s political development include the Good
Friday Agreement and the end of violent conflict between the British state, the
nationalists and the unionists. As a result of this mobilization, Sinn Fein and
its Protestant working class counterpart, the Progressive Unionist Party, have
slowly begun to embrace constitutional politics.
In the 1980s
nationalist muralists broadened their range to aid the increasingly successful
election campaigns of Sinn Fein, to highlight prisoner issues, and to link the
republican campaign with struggles abroad. In the last twenty years, republican
muralists have drawn inspiration from a variety of anti-imperialist and
democratic struggles around the world. Many murals reference Nelson Mandela and
the struggles of blacks in South Africa, or the Zapatistas in Mexico. Other
murals depict the events of 1916, when a loose coalition of the Irish labor
movement led by James Connolly and nationalist agitators revolted against the
British presence in Ireland. The murals
strive to express the complex mix of hopelessness and passion that a poorly
organized group of rebels must feel when they stand against a much more
powerful and resourceful political enemy.
Belfast
today remains a bitterly divided city. High steel and concrete walls still cut
through its neighborhoods, separating the nationalist from the unionist areas.
As this society edges towards a post-conflict situation, murals continue to be
a prominent form of memorial. Many images commemorate the loss of life on both
sides, caused by years of violent conflict. In some areas the peace process has
generated a number of humorous, cartoon-style murals. In the Protestant areas,
for instance, bulldogs allude to the British connection.
Hopefully,
political violence will not return to Northern Ireland. But we may also hope
that Northern Ireland’s rich tradition of political murals will live on as a
popular expression of politics, culture, and their intersection.