Queer Globalization/Local Homosexualities: Citizenship, Sexuality,
and the Afterlife of Colonialism marked the first international meeting of scholars
and activists working in the fields of postcolonial and queer studies. Held at the CUNY
Graduate Center on April 23-25, the conference was the first in a series of conferences
sponsored by the Rockefeller Foundation organized around the theme of CLAGSs
Residency Fellowship Program in the Humanities, Citizenship and Sexualities:
Transcultural Constructions.
The conference attracted an estimated 300 participants from across the
United States and Latin America. The perspectives of scholars and activists from different
academic disciplines, backgrounds, and experiences were represented in twenty panels that
explored, among other things: the relationship between American imperialism and sexual
dissidence, the significance of the transformation of global capital for contemporary
queer politics, the importance of diasporic communities in the formation of queer
identities and cultures, the multidirectional travel routes of feminist theory and
practice, and the possibilities for the articulation of a resistant sexual politic within
a transnational context.
The Queer Globalization conference was conceived in part as a
grassroots effort to understand what is at stake in the increasing globalization of
lesbian/gay/bisexual/transgender politics. Conference chairs Arnaldo Cruz-Malavé and
Martin Manalansan opened the conference by drawing an historical comparison between the
exportation of contemporary queer politics and the imperialism of the late nineteenth
century. Symbolically the CLAGS conference marked the centenary of the Spanish American
War of 1898, which resulted in the colonial occupation by the United States of Puerto
Rico, Cuba, Guam, and the Philippines. "One hundred years later," Cruz-Malavé
and Manalansan explained, "a different but no less violent process of
economic and cultural globalization that packages queer differences for world
consumption is patently underway. This process risks sweeping away queer particularities,
appropriating queer locations and desires, and reducing the density of our histories
of our very lives."
This theme was
explored and developed in more detail by the participants in the opening night plenary,
"Globalization and Dissident Sexualities," moderated by Ella Shohat (CUNY
Graduate Center). Echoing the comments made by the conference organizers, Cindy Patton
(Emory University) noted that "American ideas about sexuality [have] sped around the
world faster than any queer could fly." Patton considered the ways that discourses of
sexual liberation travel by looking at the recent protests by Taiwanese homosexuals
against mandatory military service, noting the curious and troubling ways that the debates
in the United States about the rights of homosexuals to serve openly in the military were
used against homosexuals in Taiwan.
Wesley Thomas (University of Washington) further underscored the
difficulty in translating and defining sexual identities across cultures. Navajo culture,
for example, recognizes multiple gendered identities that cannot be adequately defined
according to the Western sex-gender system.
In a paper read by Cruz-Malavé, Silviano Santiago (University of Rio de
Janeiro) argued that discourses about sexuality travel in multiple and circuitous paths.
Santiago, one of the leading figures in Brazilian cultural studies, explicitly challenged
the preconception that the metropolitan West is superior to Brazilian culture, asking the
audience to consider how Brazil has contributed to lesbian and gay studies. "Tell me
the meaning," Santiago charged, "and I will tell you the direction."
Chela Sandoval (University of Santa Barbara)
reminded conference participants of the contributions made by the U.S. Third World
Feminist Movement of the 1960s and 1970s to the development of an oppositional mode of
consciousness and political mobilization. It is this "methodology of the
oppressed" or "hermeneutics of love" that can help us imagine what a
decolonizing queer globalization might look like in the new millennium.
The themes of history and feminism were picked
up by respondent M. Jacqui Alexander (Guggenheim Fellow at Medgar Evers College), who
described the ways in which "queer" operates as an imperialistic and
homogenizing term that tends to flatten or erase feminism. Alexander maintained that the
lesbian and gay movement needs to think through identity politics, suggesting that
its not enough that were always against something. What shall we be for?
The conference concluded on Saturday with a
plenary entitled "Intersections of Postcolonial and Queer Theories." Moderated
by Geeta Patel (Wellesley College), the panel staged a conversation between scholars in
two fields that are rarely put into dialogue.
Norma Alarcón (University of California-Berkeley) noted that much is lost
in the "turf wars" among academics who fail to think across disciplines.
Kobena Mercer (New York University) advocated for the role of
psychoanalysis in black cultural studies as a way of combating the unresolved political
problem of black homophobia. According to Mercer, sexuality remains the "Achilles
Heel" of the black body politic.
Michael Warner (Rutgers University) suggested
that postcolonial studies, especially the work of Gayatri Spivak, has had a significant
impact on other fields and methodologies, including queer theory. Warner challenged the
so-called "normalization" of the queer movement and privatization of sex culture
in the United States, adding that "In the New World Order, we should be more than
usually cautious about global utopianisms that require American slang."
K. Anthony Appiah (Harvard University) concluded in his remarks, however,
that it is not queerness but gayness that is traveling across the globe and that offers
the possibility for expressing the full range of human sexual experiences.