|
FALL 2008 COURSE DESCRIPTIONS American
Politics :: Comparative
Politics Professor Halper Civil Liberties focuses on freedom of expression and privacy, each viewed from normative and constitutional perspectives. Among the specific topics considered are defamation, hate speech and offensive speech, broadcast regulation, obscenity and indecency, public nuisances, commercial speech, speech plus, national security, privacy as withholding information, privacy as seclusion, and privacy as bodily integrity. Robust class discussion is encouraged. A final examination and critiques of three articles/chapters are required. Professor Stanley Renshon As Iraq and numerous other examples have demonstrated, decisions about war and peace are among the most consequential that a president can make. It would be reassuring if we knew that presidents and their advisors were able to step back and view the evidence favoring one policy over another dispassionately, with a clear understanding of their potential costs and benefits, while subjecting them to a clear assessment through the decisions lenses of the strategic, moral, national, and international considerations that ought to be weighed. Regrettably for this ideal, decades of political and psychological research building on empirical and case study analyses of decisions regarding war and peace leave little room for optimism. We know that there are many cognitive shoals on which such decisions can flounder, that such decisions must be made in circumstances of ambiguous (at best) information and high stakes, that presidents are imperfect “rational actors” (though some are better than others), that advisory systems can malfunction, and that there exists little agreement about the circumstances, outside of direct attack, when the use of force might be necessary. On the other hand, presidents and their advisors have risen to the occasion—designing and implementing policies that have avoided major wars (containment, the Cuban Missile Crisis) while preserving and even furthering American strategic interests. On occasion, when required (Bosnia, Afghanistan), they have even used force effectively, though not without costs. Students interested in the course should be in touch with Professor Renshon (srenshon@gc.cuny.edu) to receive a brief orienting reading assignment for the first class. Professor Tien Comparative Politics Professor Asher Arian Professor Markovitz Winston Churchill famously declared: "Democracy is the worst form of government except for all those others that have been tried." The Federalist authors proclaimed that they did not want to create "an elected despotism". Clinton Rositer maintained that the American Presidency was "a matrix for dictatorship". Democracies are not supposed to go to war with each other. However, at least some democracies in modern times have been associated with extremist policies in war and peace. Among the questions this seminar will consider are: Is there an association between democracy and ethnic cleansing? Do democratic institutions facilitate genocide? Are there complex processes that push democratic constituencies in murderous directions? Is "empowerment" of the "people" always progressive? Why and when do democratic institutions and procedures appear to result in growing inequality Professor Eva Bellin This course is designed to provide graduate students with an introduction to some of the central debates in the field of Middle East politics today including: the prospects for democratic transition, the puzzle of persistent authoritarianism, the political impact of institutions and civil society, the dynamics of Islamic social movements, the politics of cultural change, the interaction of gender and politics, the political economy of development, and the symbolic construction of power. Students will be exposed to a variety of methods and approaches to the study of Middle East politics including: comparative historical analysis, cases studies, rational choice, survey research, ethnographic studies, and discourse analysis. The course will link the study of Middle East cases to larger theoretical questions in the field of comparative politics and practice students in the professional skills of the discipline. Professor Susan L. Woodward This seminar aims at a comprehensive, graduate-level introduction to the primary empirical theories, concepts, and research questions of comparative politics. Students should find it useful as preparation for the first exam in comparative politics, but its focus on identifying, analyzing, and critiquing theories should be of use to many in other disciplines as well whose research would benefit from knowledge of the literature. Class meetings emphasize intense discussion of the arguments, methods, and evidence of the readings assigned for the topic each week. Requirements including reading the assigned material prior to each class meeting, participation in class discussion, brief written essays summarizing and analyzing the literature on topics to be assigned periodically, and a final examination Professor Andreopoulos Professor Sun The course will apply the general historical and theoretical frameworks that guide the study of IPE to the global economic relations of major Asian states. Among the issues we will consider are the evolution and structure of the international economic systems in relation to Asia, government behavior in the international economy, the politics of international competitiveness, the politics of multinational corporations and FDI, and the politics of globalization. We will pay particular attention to the two emerging giants, China and India, but will also consider the rise of Japan and the new industrialized economies that heralded the Asian resurgence in the contemporary global economy. Professor Woodward The purpose of this seminar is to facilitate individual student research projects on some aspect of this political and transformational project. The emphasis in seminar discussion, therefore, will be on the alternative theoretical approaches (e.g., realist, constructivist, political economy, post-colonial), existing data sets and indexes, classic case studies, and theoretical and policy debates that one can use in identifying a good research question and designing the research. Students will be graded both on their seminar participation and the final research paper. Professor Marshall Berman Professor Morgenstern Professor Wallach
PSC 70100 [93244] Ancient and Medieval Political Theory 3 credits, Tuesdays, 6:30-8:30 Preliminary Description: This course interprets selected texts from major figures in ancient and medieval political thought--principally Thucydides, Plato, Aristotle, Cicero, Augustine, and Aquinas. Our central focus will be their formations of concepts of virtue or excellence as standards of description and evaluation for individuals and institutions--especially in relation to the principles and practices of democracy or related forms of popular rule. We also will discuss contemporary authors concerned with comparable problematics. WRITING REQUIREMENTS: two mid-terms and one interpretive essay. Professor Wolin The idea of human rights has been responsible for remarkable successes as well as some egregious failures. Our course will take a long-term approach to understanding human rights in order to better appreciate their contemporary significance and import. We will begin by examining the philosophical origins of human rights in theories of modern natural law (Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau). We will then proceed to review the lively polemics surrounding the French Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen, when Protestants, Jews, women, and slaves invoked human rights as the basis for their emancipation. Strangely, during the nineteenth century, the discourse of “human rights” virtually disappeared. (Why??). The idea was only revived in the mid-twentieth century, with the UN Charter (and the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights), as a moral and practical response to the Nazis’ genocidal imperialism. During the 1980s, the discourse of human rights played a key role in delegitimating communism. Lastly, we will examine human rights’ controversial track record in the contemporary world. Are human rights, in the last analysis, merely a cynical tool of the Great Powers or do they possess a legitimate, untapped emancipatory potential? Public
Policy Required readings: Professor Christa Altenstetter The course will be conducted as a research seminar. It is interdisciplinary in scope (political, science, law and public administration), comprehensive in subject matter, and pursues a comparative/international tenor. This course is one of two core courses of the Interdisciplinary Concentration in European Union Studies at the Graduate Center/CUNY. Students in political science can take it as part of a major or a minor field of study in the Ph.D/M.A. Program in Political Science. Upon completion of the core requirements, students will receive a Certificate of Completion issued by the Office of the Associate Provost for Instructional Technology and Dean for Interdisciplinary Studies. Listed below are the readings that constitute the core of the required readings Altenstetter, Christa. Medical Devices. European Union Policymaking and The Implementation of Health and Patient Safety in France. New Brunswick: NJ: Transaction Publishers, 2008. Professor Joyce Gelb This course analyzes various public policies related to gender in a comparative perspective. While we will attempt to define “gender related policies” from the broadest possible vantage point, among the policies currently to be considered are sexual politics including reproductive rights and violence against women; family policies including child care, parental leave and child support; and equal opportunity policies including anti sex discrimination as well as sexual harassment. The scope of the course will include analysis of policies in Europe and the US, as well as selected Asian and Latin American nations , though the scope will be truly international. The course will also highlight the importance of transnational impacts on national policy making. The focus is on the conditions and factors which help to create “women friendly” policies . There will be one major research paper and other assignments to be determined. Professor Janet Gornick This course will begin with an overview of the field of public policy evaluation, from a political science perspective. The first section of the course covers lessons on evaluating the empirical aspects of public policy and provides an analytic framework for assessing the value judgments that inevitably influence policy decisions. The second section of the course provides a survey of standard public policy evaluation techniques. In this part of the course, we will cover the common quantitative approaches, including experimental designs, quasi-experimental designs, and cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analyses. We will also explore the ways in which qualitative and quantitative methods can be combined in the field of public policy evaluation. The third section of the course focuses on politics. Here, we will take an in-depth look at the role of think tanks and their influence on public policy; and we will assess the role of policy research on decision-making, through the lens of the American states. In the final section of the course, we assess the potential for misuse of evaluations. We then close by analyzing the conditions under which policy lessons can be drawn across time and space. The course will be conducted as a seminar. Each student will be required to chair one class session, either solo or with a partner. There will be a midterm examination and a final examination. Professor John Mollenkopf This course will be jointly taught with Professor Michael Minkenberg, Max Weber Professor of European Studies at NYU, and will alternate meetings between the Graduate Center and NYU. After considering what fundamental organizing principles might be characteristic of cities in Europe as compared with those of the United States, the course will consider how each set of cities is responding to the challenges of the 21st century, including such topics as citizen participation and the prospects for local democracy, urban development, immigration and growing ethnic diversity, neighborhood change and gentrification, social exclusion and stresses on the local welfare state, and global economic competition and deindustrialization. Attention will also be paid to the role of cultural production and cultural projection and the special status of capital cities as hinge points between national politics and local life. Students will pick case study cities from the two settings as a venue for exploring one of these topics in depth. Professor Featherstone Professor Frances Fox Piven This workshop will be a collaborative endeavor. It is for students who are contemplating the hurdle of writing a dissertation proposal, as well as students who are already at work on a proposal. The group will discuss and contribute to individual projects in an effort to improve them. No one fails.
|