|
|
Reviewer 1 |
Reviewer 2 |
Reviewer 3 |
|
How used in
a classrm? |
NA |
I
wouldn’t. Skip the art contest, skip the festival.
Have a diversity day with representatives of various community groups sharing
the podium. Music and speakers, films, readers, theatre. |
|
|
Which
grades? |
10th
grade |
9-12 |
10th |
|
Subjects? |
ELA, Social
Studies, Art, Music, and FACS |
SS, ELA |
Social
Studies/ELA |
|
Appropriateness,
possibility to strengthen: Learning Goals/Academic subjects |
This section
is fine. |
Where is
literature here? Are kids reading Primo Levi or Elie
Wiesel? Even Anne Frank? Seeing films
(fiction/docs.)? |
Learning
goal #2 is a little unclear in wording and in how it will appear in the
project. What literature? What the students produce? |
|
Community
needs |
Yes, needs
are addressed. |
They’re all
jumbled here. Addressing intolerance and genocide ¹ multi culti food fest. Many great goals and good ideas BUT too
many! |
Good |
|
Character
virtue prominence |
This
section is fine. |
Objective
2, Justice and Fairness, better addressed by ongoing contact with local human
rights NGO’s and agencies as well as work within school community. Who
“create(s) guidelines”? Vague! |
Good |
|
SL
activities |
These are
fine. |
1. Unclear |
Are the
memorial program and the multicultural festival to take place at the same
time/event? |
|
Reflection
activities |
These are
very good. |
“Reflections”
2+3 aren’t really reflections. #2’s an
activity, #3’s a celebration |
Need to more
specifically reflect the character virtues. |
|
Costs |
$150-$500 |
Re planning,
#2: Why must guest speakers be “victims”? |
Depending on
the nature of the memorial, could be manageable or exorbitant. |
|
Time needed |
1-2 months |
Months |
At least 2
months |
|
Teacher
preparation required |
Teacher
will instruct students about the Holocaust and facilitate project. |
(na) |
Doable |
|
Possible
improvements |
“Memorial
program” also involves living community members; maybe the name could be
changed to an “Honor Program” |
Choose a single
focus (I suggest bringing speakers.) Create dialogue within school community
re Jim Crow diversity, tie current tensions within community to history e.g.
racism, anti-Semitism, Patriot Act and Jap. Internment. |
Clarify
further how the memorial will work and how/if it is tied to the festival. |
|
Assessment
items |
Rubric too
general. Assessment is fine. |
Too easy.
Need essays. |
Pretty
obvious questions and no longer-answer questions. |
|
Experience
needed in CE |
Little or no
experience |
Moderately
experienced |
Moderately
experienced |
|
Experience
needed in SL |
Little
or no experience |
Very
experienced |
Moderately
experienced |
|
Rate the
project in the following areas: |
|||
|
Doability |
Strong |
Weak |
Average |
|
Addressing
the character virtues |
Strong |
Average-Strong |
Average-Strong |
|
Relevance to
actual academic content |
Strong |
Average-Strong |
Average-Strong |
|
Reflection
activities |
Strong |
Weak-Average |
Average |
|
How strongly
are each of the character virtues addressed by this
project…. |
|||
|
Caring |
Very
Strong |
Somewhat |
Somewhat |
|
Citizenship |
Very Strong |
Somewhat |
Very Strong |
|
Fairness
|
Very Strong |
Somewhat |
Strongly |
|
Giving |
Not at all |
Somewhat |
Somewhat |
|
Respect |
Very Strong |
Strongly |
Strongly |
|
Responsibility |
Somewhat |
Somewhat |
Strongly |
|
Trustworthy |
Not at all |
Somewhat |
Not at all |
Curriculum Title Reviewed: Using Shakespeare to Breakdown Ethnic and
Geographic Barriers
|
|
Reviewer 1 |
Reviewer 2 |
Reviewer 3 |
|
How used in
a classrm? |
As a part of
an English unit (Shakespeare, form writing, creative writing, etc) |
|
|
|
Which
grades? |
7-12 (though
older may grasp to form better) |
9-12 |
9-12/6-8 |
|
Subjects? |
English,
European history |
ELA |
Language
Arts/Social Studies |
|
Appropriateness,
possibility to strengthen: Learning Goals/Academic subjects |
Very strong
and should be very easy to fit into project. |
Work
w/juniors and seniors. |
Shouldn’t
there be a learning goal about appreciating diversity and social equity? |
|
Community
needs |
Extremely
relevant and can be applied to many different areas (Socioeconomic,
geographic, etc) |
Breaking down
stereotypes, increasing respect always great. |
Good |
|
Character
virtue prominence |
Virtues
seem very simple (in a good way) – direct and can be meaningful to student
situations. |
Excellent. |
Good |
|
SL
activities |
Yes – very concise.
Tips on finding partners would be helpful (For example, you could recommend
contacting the Department of English chair or another school initially) |
Very
clear. Finally get the web address! |
#1 isn’t
really a service activity. |
|
Reflection activities |
Yes, would
allow for adequate and meaningful reflection. |
Good
reflections, esp. 2 &3. |
Need to
connect to virtues. |
|
Costs |
Costs would
be necessary to allow students to meet face to face. Seem minimal and
feasible. |
Transportation |
Doable if
both schools have computer access. |
|
Time needed |
Good space
of time – they’ll know Shakespeare backwards and forwards! |
2 months |
At least 2-3
months. |
|
Teacher
preparation required |
Making
contact with another school, devising a systematic approach (w/ the other
teacher) to effectively address the issues between the two schools. |
Knowledge of
region, Shakespeare |
Extensive
because the inter-school partnership would require a strong teacher
partnership |
|
Possible
improvements |
A
list of recommended topics would be helpful – for example: Race:
Othello Image:
Sonnet 130 (My Mistress’ Eyes…) Class:
King Lear |
Expand peer
educator aspect. Expand KWL model. |
It might be
difficult to have two schools in different situations both have access to
online equipment. |
|
Assessment
items |
Great
assessments – very relative and could be used with any Shakespeare lesson. |
Good. |
I’d like to
see a little more virtue emphasis in the questions. Currently only one
addresses character ed. |
|
Experience
needed in CE |
Moderately
experienced (The more experience the better to objectively lead a
barrier-breaking project.) |
Moderately
experienced |
Moderately
experienced |
|
Experience
needed in SL |
Little
or no experience. |
Moderately
experienced |
Moderately
experienced |
|
Rate the
project in the following areas: |
|||
|
Doability |
Strong |
Average-Strong |
Average |
|
Addressing
the character virtues |
Average-Strong |
Strong |
Average |
|
Relevance to
actual academic content |
Strong |
Strong |
Average-Strong |
|
Reflection
activities |
Average-Strong |
Average-Strong |
Average |
|
How strongly are
each of the character virtues addressed by this project…. |
|||
|
Caring |
Very Strong |
Very
strong |
Somewhat |
|
Citizenship |
Strongly |
Strongly |
Strongly |
|
Fairness
|
Somewhat |
Somewhat |
Strongly |
|
Giving |
Strongly |
Somewhat |
Somewhat |
|
Respect |
Very Strong |
Very strong |
Strongly |
|
Responsibility |
Somewhat |
Somewhat |
Somewhat |
|
Trustworthy |
Somewhat |
Somewhat |
Not at all |