|
|
Reviewer 1 |
Reviewer 2 |
Reviewer 3 |
|
How used in a classrm? |
As a science project. |
Whole class participation. |
|
|
Which grades? |
Middle and High School. |
9-12. |
6-12 |
|
Subjects? |
Science, possibly math. |
Science, Math |
Health, SS, Science, Math, Interdisciplinary |
|
Appropriateness, possibility to strengthen:
Learning Goals/Academic subjects |
Very appropriate.
Makes students aware of littering, lack of recycling, etc. Could the lunchroom be a target for more
recycling? I see a lot of waste of
food and non-food at schools. |
Math standard #3 should be included because of the
data collection. |
More math! More technology. Build simple database e.g. excel/access. |
|
Community needs |
Needs are important. In Perinten,
where I live, we have a |
Community need is
addressed. |
Clarify problem: does any
community have dormant recycling or none? |
|
Character virtue prominence |
Students learn responsibility for the care of their
community. Important to instill this
idea in an apathetic generation. |
Include caring. |
How is letter to govt. (reflection #2) a service?
Are students lobbying or is this just p.r.? |
|
SL activities |
You would need a teacher who is well versed in
waste management and recycling. |
This section is good. |
Expand “develop an advocacy program” |
|
Reflection activities |
(n/a) |
Reflection #2 is a service activity, not a
reflection. |
Add more esp. reflection on process of this
project: e.g. handling bureaucratic inertia, indifference, hostility, or
ageism. |
|
Costs |
Suggests making a power point program – need due to
technology. Buses for neighborhood
cleanup. |
$0-$150. |
Minimal. |
|
Time needed |
At least one full semester, possibly the entire
year. |
Year long. |
3 mos. |
|
Teacher preparation required |
(n/a) |
Assist students in organizing project and obtaining
any necessary contacts. |
Minimal. |
|
Possible improvements |
(n/a) |
For a celebration/evaluation activity students
could set up a recycling center in school.
Service component needs to be strengthened. |
Expand explicit connections to local government
agencies. Involve s.w.
haulers and recyclers. Add reuse,
conservation (reduction). There are 3
R’s not just recycle! |
|
Assessment items |
Very technical project that incorporates a good
deal of science, math, and technology.
|
Assessment is okay. Rubric is too general. |
Fine. |
|
Experience needed in CE |
Moderately experienced. |
Little or no experience. |
Little or no experience. |
|
Experience needed in SL |
Moderately experienced. |
Little or no experience. |
Little or no experience. |
|
Rate the
project in the following areas: |
|||
|
Doability |
(n/a) |
Strong |
Strong |
|
Addressing the character virtues |
(n/a) |
Strong |
Strong |
|
Relevance to actual academic content |
(n/a) |
Average-Strong |
Average-Strong |
|
Reflection activities |
(n/a) |
Average |
Average |
|
How
strongly are each of the character virtues addressed
by this project…. |
|||
|
Caring |
Very Strong. |
Strongly. |
Very strong |
|
Citizenship |
Very Strong.
|
Strongly. |
Very strong |
|
Fairness |
Somewhat. |
Not at all. |
Somewhat |
|
Giving |
Somewhat. |
Somewhat. |
Somewhat |
|
Respect |
Strongly. |
Strongly. |
Somewhat |
|
Responsibility |
Strongly. |
Strongly. |
Strongly |
|
Trustworthy |
Somewhat. |
Not at all. |
Somewhat |
Curriculum Title Reviewed:
Waterbody
Rescue
|
How used in a classrm? |
Need teachers who are experts in environmental
management for this complicated project!
|
Whole class. |
As a service project for a high functioning science
class |
|
Which grades? |
Grades 11 - 12 |
9-12 |
9-12 |
|
Subjects? |
Science, Technology |
Math, Science, ELA, Technology. |
Science, could draw parallels in Math also |
|
Appropriateness, possibility to strengthen:
Learning Goals/Academic subjects |
Since I am science impaired, I personally found
this project difficult to follow.
Smart science people might love it, however. |
Additional standards could be added. |
Appropriate and very specific for science students |
|
Community needs |
What is “NYS DEC”? I don’t know what DEC means. Too much technical jargon. I don’t know how pressing this “need” is
compared to many other problems in our society. |
This section is fine. |
Reclaim a degraded body of water and help restore
it – great need. Additional partners could be local environmental AmeriCorps teams |
|
Character virtue prominence |
Caring and Responsibility seem appropriate for an
environmental study. |
Include civic virtue and citizenship. |
Character virtues are
prominent, but teacher will need to stress them to keep them on the forefront |
|
SL activities |
Unless a teacher was very well versed in this
complex subject matter, they would need more details. |
This section is very good. |
SL activities can be replicated. Extremely
scientific and specific. Not everyone could do this project. |
|
Reflection activities |
(n/a) |
These activities are very good. |
Great reflection activities. Students will think
outside of scientific box, but make connections through art |
|
Costs |
Need lots of high tech toys to pull off this
project – “GIT”, “GPS”, and “GIS”. |
$1,000+ |
Minimal. Costs needed for bussing students to
water. |
|
Time needed |
Yearlong project, with a log of adult/ technical/
community support and intervention. |
Year long. |
On-going, year long project |
|
Teacher preparation required |
(n/a) |
Teacher instruction on use of equipment for water
testing and how to analyze data collected. |
Community outreach |
|
Possible improvements |
(n/a) |
Project is fine. |
Modify the detailed scientific learning, if
students aren’t at that level |
|
Assessment items |
Quiz seems very relevant but very technical. Only a limited number of students would be
interested in a complex problem like this one. |
Assessments are fine. Rubric too general. |
Relatively difficult and scientific, not appropriate
for casual learners. |
|
Experience needed in CE |
Very experienced.
|
Little or no experience. |
Moderately |
|
Experience needed in SL |
Very experienced.
|
Moderately experienced. |
Moderately |
|
Rate the
project in the following areas: |
|||
|
Doability |
(n/a) |
Average-Strong |
Average-Strong |
|
Addressing the character virtues |
(n/a) |
Strong |
Average-Strong |
|
Relevance to actual academic content |
(n/a) |
Strong |
Average-Strong |
|
Reflection activities |
(n/a) |
Strong |
Average-Strong |
|
How strongly are each of
the character virtues addressed by this project…. |
|||
|
Caring |
Strongly |
Very strong |
Strongly |
|
Citizenship |
Somewhat |
Strongly |
Strongly |
|
Fairness |
Somewhat |
Not at all |
Not at all |
|
Giving |
Somewhat |
Somewhat |
Somewhat |
|
Respect |
Somewhat |
Somewhat |
Strongly |
|
Responsibility |
Strongly |
Strongly |
Strongly |
|
Trustworthy |
Not at all |
Not at all |
Somewhat |
Curriculum Title Reviewed:
Welcome Wagon Brochure
|
|
Reviewer 1 |
Reviewer 2 |
Reviewer 3 |
|
How used in a classrm? |
Whole class involvement |
|
I’m confused. Is this brochure about local
businesses or social services? Why do local businesses need free advertising provided
by students and how does this differ from the Yellow Pages? |
|
Which grades? |
6-12 |
9-12 |
6-8/9-12 |
|
Subjects? |
SS, Technology |
SS, MST |
ELA/Technology/Social Studies |
|
Appropriateness, possibility to strengthen: Learning
Goals/Academic subjects |
These are fine. |
Define the scope more clearly. Summary says “business services and
community resources”. Reflection 1: “social services” |
Good, if we’re talking social services |
|
Community needs |
Section is good. |
Don’t duplicate existing resources. Partners-government, realtors |
Good |
|
Character virtue prominence |
These are fine. |
Excellent |
Okay |
|
SL activities |
Activities are fine. A list of computer programs to
design brochures might be helpful |
Lighten up on #2. Be practical. |
Still confused about the brochure. |
|
Reflection activities |
Students might reflect on technical problems they
have in creating brochures. |
Add more facts to mix. How will students “consider” what services are
still needed in the community? Do research, survey, etc. |
Okay |
|
Costs |
$0-$150 |
Transport for meetings. Who funds the fancy banquet? Why not get
printing donated and go 4 color? Or run as insert in
local paper. |
Pretty expensive if the kids have to re-stock a lot
of brochures frequently. Are community organizations going to contribute $? |
|
Time needed |
Semester long |
Quickly so it isn’t outdated before it is printed!! |
About a semester |
|
Teacher preparation required |
Teacher will instruct
students on use of computer program for brochures |
Software expertise. |
Little |
|
Possible improvements |
Fine as written |
Do it as a “green map”
(search online). Community map w/local
business sponsors, perhaps with child/youth viewpoint. |
I’d suggest this lesson plan not be used if it is
going to highlight local businesses. I think there’s a conflict when students
become free advertisers. |
|
Assessment items |
Rubric is too general. Questions are related to specific
geographical areas and they use terms unfamiliar to us, the readers. |
A joke.
Weirdly specific (1-6). Essay
#1 is surreal. Is Tesla a homeboy?
Regardless, how is he relevant? Essay #2 “Personal place of power” very new
age, and I’m a real granola Birkenstocker. |
Poor. This requires students to learn very little
new info. What high school student doesn’t already know restaurants and
businesses in the area? How is that real curriculum? |
|
Experience needed in CE |
Little or no experience |
Moderately experience |
Little or no experience |
|
Experience needed in SL |
Little or no experience |
Moderately experience |
Little or no experience |
|
How strongly are each of
the character virtues addressed by this project…. |
|||
|
Doability |
Strong |
Average-Strong |
Average |
|
Addressing the character virtues |
Strong |
Strong |
Weak-Average |
|
Relevance to actual academic content |
Average |
Average-strong |
Weak |
|
Reflection activities |
Average-Strong |
Average-strong |
Weak-Average |
|
Rate the project in the following areas: |
|||
|
Caring |
Strong |
Somewhat |
Somewhat |
|
Citizenship |
Very Strong |
Very Strong |
Somewhat |
|
Fairness |
Not at all |
Somewhat |
Not at all |
|
Giving |
Strong |
Somewhat |
Somewhat |
|
Respect |
Not at all |
Not at all |
Not at all |
|
Responsibility |
Strong |
Strongly |
Somewhat |
|
Trustworthy |
Not at all |
Somewhat |
Somewhat |
Curriculum Title Reviewed:
|
|
Reviewer 1 |
Reviewer 2 |
Reviewer 3 |
|
|
How used in a classrm? |
This project can be carried out by small groups and
whole classes. |
Use in conjunction with science class as lessons on
how diseases are spread |
|
|
|
Which grades? |
9-12 |
9-12 |
9-12 |
|
|
Subjects? |
Science, Health, ELA |
Science, health |
Science, health |
|
|
Appropriateness, possibility to strengthen:
Learning Goals/Academic subjects |
Learning goals are appropriate. Add ELA standards related to oral and
written reflections |
Appropriate goals and skills, could be strengthened
by having a west nile survivor guest speak |
More on vector borne disease. Research link, if any to climate change and
vector borne diseases. Research link,
e.g., fleas/rats/plague or lyme disease. |
|
|
Community needs |
Community needs are addressed |
Relevant, additional partners may be local health
clinics and bilingual support agencies for non-English speaking adults |
Get help w/cleanup-parents, scouts, folks w/trucks |
|
|
Character virtue prominence |
This section is good. |
Prominent. With prodding
of teachers, students can incorporate learned virtues into their
teach back opportunities. |
Excellent. |
|
|
SL activities |
Yes, activities are detailed enough to complete
activities. |
Detailed for easy replication. Once a successful
project happens, it would be great to share brochures with other educators in
the region. |
Easily. |
|
|
Reflection activities |
Reflection activity one and two are fine. Number three reflection should include
mention of Power Point. |
Appropriate and specific. Students will emphasize
character virtues in all aspects |
#3’s too easy.
“Present a summary.” Is this just a written report? It will never get
read. |
|
|
Costs |
0-$250 |
Bussing to clean up |
Minimal except transport. |
|
|
Time needed |
1-2 months |
1-2 months |
Mid winter through June. 5 Months? 2 phases-1)pamphlet
and educational outreach 2)pickin’ up tires… |
|
|
Teacher preparation required |
Teacher will set up
pre-learning background and investigate websites to be used. Teacher should
make a list of community contact persons. |
Community outreach |
Minimal |
|
|
Possible improvements |
The project is fine as it
is presented. |
Have a |
Clarify telegraphic style. For instance in Celebration, what’s a
“SL/Char. Ed Moment” announcement. Sounds preachy. Do more P.R. for project |
|
|
Assessment items |
Questions are relevant and appropriate. Rubric is too
general. |
Relevant and appropriate for reporting purposes. |
1-6 too easy! |
|
|
Experience needed in CE |
Little or no experience |
Moderately experienced |
Little or no experience |
|
|
Experience needed in SL |
Little or no experience |
Moderately experienced |
Little or no experience |
|
|
How strongly are each of
the character virtues addressed by this project…. |
||||
|
Doability |
Strong |
Weak (unless you live in |
Strong |
|
|
Addressing the character virtues |
Strong |
Average-Strong |
Strong |
|
|
Relevance to actual academic content |
Strong |
Average-Strong |
Strong |
|
|
Reflection activities |
Strong |
Average-Strong |
Average-strong |
|
|
Rate the project in the following areas: |
||||
|
Caring |
Very Strong |
Strongly |
Very strong |
|
|
Citizenship |
Very Strong |
Strongly |
Very strong |
|
|
Fairness |
Not at all |
Not at all |
Not at all |
|
|
Giving |
Somewhat |
Somewhat |
Strongly |
|
|
Respect |
Somewhat |
Somewhat |
Not at all |
|
|
Responsibility |
Very Strong |
Somewhat |
Very strong |
|
|
Trustworthy |
Not at all |
Not at all |
Somewhat |
|
Curriculum Title Reviewed:
Youth Conservation Corps (YCC)
|
|
Reviewer 1 |
Reviewer 2 |
Reviewer 3 |
|
|
How used in a classrm? |
This project would need to be implemented by a Service
Learning or Connections class, one that is self-contained. This could also be done as a club. |
I would recommend that the curriculum be used
during class time. Not on weekends. |
Interdisciplinary |
|
|
Which grades? |
9-12 |
9-12 |
11-12 |
|
|
Subjects? |
Science, Health, Social Studies |
Science |
MST, SS, Careers |
|
|
Appropriateness, possibility to strengthen:
Learning Goals/Academic subjects |
This section is fine. |
Good learning goals regarding environmental
agencies and planning a group or corps. Strengthened if done in school. |
Best as follow up to earth science, environmental
biology, and chemistry. |
|
|
Community needs |
This section is satisfactory. |
Very relevant – taking care of the environment is
very important-great list of willing partners, particularly AmeriCorps. |
Yes. Sports
clubs (e.g. fishing), land conservation groups, and NGO’s. |
|
|
Character virtue prominence |
These virtues are good. |
Character virtues are prominent,
but also need to be referred to frequently. |
Ample. |
|
|
SL activities |
This section is good. |
The activities have the potential to be very
overwhelming. After school and weekend program may have a lot of competition
within the school community. |
Yes. |
|
|
Reflection activities |
This section is satisfactory. |
Appropriate and specific |
Yes. |
|
|
Costs |
$500+ |
Costs for transportation and pot-luck meals |
Real $-to provide tools, transportation-seek
donations/grants. |
|
|
Time needed |
Year long |
Year long |
Full year |
|
|
Teacher preparation required |
Teacher instruction on how
to use equipment, establish partnerships and how to analyze data. |
Community outreach – environmentally, civic groups
and YCC contacts |
Science/technology background. |
|
|
Possible improvements |
None at this time. |
Doing more of the project during the school day |
Partner w/college service clubs. |
|
|
Assessment items |
Assessment items are fine. Rubric is too general. |
Very scientific, not designed for casual learners |
2-3 somewhat too technical. |
|
|
Experience needed in CE |
Little or no experience |
Moderately experienced |
Moderately experienced |
|
|
Experience needed in SL |
Very experienced |
Moderately experienced |
Very experienced |
|
|
How strongly are each of the
character virtues addressed by this project…. |
||||
|
Doability |
Average |
Average |
Average |
|
|
Addressing the character virtues |
Strong |
Average |
Strong |
|
|
Relevance to actual academic content |
Strong |
Average-Strong |
Strong |
|
|
Reflection activities |
Strong |
Average-Strong |
Average-strong |
|
|
Rate the project in the following areas: |
||||
|
Caring |
Very Strong |
Somewhat |
Very strong |
|
|
Citizenship |
Very Strong |
Strongly |
Very strong |
|
|
Fairness |
Not at all |
Somewhat |
Somewhat |
|
|
Giving |
Very Strong |
Strongly |
Very strong |
|
|
Respect |
Strongly |
Strongly |
Strongly |
|
|
Responsibility |
Strongly |
Strongly |
Very strong |
|
|
Trustworthy |
Not at all |
Somewhat |
Very strong |
|