Does Conquest
Pay? demonstrates that expansion
can, in fact, provide rewards
to aggressor nations. Peter
Liberman argues that invaders
can exploit industrial societies
for short periods of time and
can maintain control and economic
performance over the long term.
This is because modern societies
are uniquely vulnerable to
coercion and repression. Hence,
by wielding a gun in one hand
and offering food with the
other, determined conquerors
can compel collaboration and
suppress resistance. Liberman's
argument is supported by several
historical case studies: Germany's
capture of Belgium and Luxembourg
during World War I and of nearly
all of Europe during World
War II; France's seizure of
the Ruhr in 1923-24; the Japanese
Empire during 1910-45; and
Soviet hegemony over Eastern
Europe in 1945-89. Does Conquest
Pay? suggests that the international
systems is more war-prone than
many optimists claim. Liberman's
findings also contribute to
debates about the stability
of empires and other authoritarian
regimes, the effectiveness
of national resistance strategies,
and the sources of rebellious
collective action.
|