![]() |
The Graduate Center City University
of New York 365 Fifth Avenue, Room 7407 New York, NY 10016-4309 telephone: 212-817-8500 fax: 212-817-1526 email: linguistics@gc.cuny.edu |
This site will look much better in a browser that supports web standards, but it is accessible to any browser or Internet device.
Two acquisition paradoxes: the effectiveness of the input
Jacqueline van Kampen (Utrecht Institute of Linguistics)
September 2, 2008 (Tuesday)
6:30 PM - 8:00 PM; Room 7102, The CUNY Graduate Center
In child language, some properties of the target grammar are acquired before others. Moreover, the early acquisition steps have typological significance. How does the child make the right data selection? Even if, somehow, the child would know the major typological parameters, it is not clear how she/he may apply the categories and configurations such parameters are stated in (Dresher 1999). Another method recommends itself. The child might use natural decoding procedures (Jakobson 1942). Rather than trying out innate major frames, the child derives them from input. This view on the acquisition procedure holds a switch from an evaluation procedure to a decision procedure. To get this working in syntax, one must find the order of acquisition steps and explain it by means of the decoding procedure. I will give two examples.