|






|

|
 
FALL 2007
In the Fall 2007 semester, the Medieval Studies Certificate Program offers
the following courses.
|
|
|
|
MSCP
80500
|
Performing
Conjugality: The Medieval Heterosexual Marriage Debate
|
|
|
Wednesday, 2:00-4:00p.m. (PLEASE NOTE TIME CHANGE)
Rm. 4433, 3 credits [90404]
|
|
|
Professor Glenn Burger
Cross listed with ENGL 80700 & THEA 86000
|
|
|
From
the twelfth to the sixteenth century the married estate underwent a
profound revaluation. The emphasis on
marriage as a sacrament whose core was the consent of its two participants,
and the conferring on this conjugal union of much of the signifying power
previously reserved for friendship between two men, worked to elevate the
lay married estate to a level on par with or even superior to that of the
celibate clergy.
The newly gendered and sexualized identities of self-controlled husband and
good wife, conjoined in one flesh through sacrament and marital affection,
not only founded a new household unit but also, to the extent that they
showed how such marital relations could act as a systematic guide to a
virtuous life, provided a model for civic society dramatically different
from previous aristocratic or clerical ones.
If by the Early Modern period, these changes had effectively ushered in a
new sex/gender system—what we have come to know as modern
heterosexuality—by selecting and controlling what and how marriage
signified, the late medieval period’s engagement with conjugality remained
much more open-ended and conflicted.
This course will consider some of the ways that attempts to represent late
medieval conjugality as something “good to think with,” and thus useful in
defining and authorizing selfhood for newly emergent groups in that
culture, might also mark a certain experimentation with the real that is
frequently difficult to align with traditionally normative clerical or
chivalric gender roles organized around virginity or noble bloodline.
We will begin by considering the legal, theological, and political
discourses producing this new emphasis on the value of the married estate
in relation to Chretien de Troyes’ romance Eric et Enide. We will consider the variety of conduct
literature that developed to regulate and define this new gender system,
particularly the wealth of literature related to “the good wife,” her
carefully husbanded femininity, and the productive bourgeois household such
conjugality makes possible. Here we
will consider such works as Le Menagier de Paris and The Knight
of La Tour Landry.
In particular, we will focus on the enormously popular story of the
absolutely patient wife, Griselda, as it travels across Europe. In addition to an important French play
version of Griselda, we will consider the English Corpus Christi cycle
plays’ depictions of Noah and his Wife, as well as Mary and Joseph.
We will conclude with Early Modern assimilations of conjugality within an
increasingly patriarchal and heterosexual social system, notably in an
early seventeenth century play of Griselda as well as in Milton’s depiction
of Adam and Eve in Paradise Lost.Middle
English texts will be read in the original.
For all other texts we will use modern English translations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MSCP
80500
|
The
Relevance of Medieval Theories/Philosophies of Language
|
|
|
Tuesday, 4:15-6:15 p.m.,
Room TBA, 3 credits [90405]
|
|
|
Professor Alex Orenstein
Cross listed with LING 79300 & PHIL 76100
|
|
|
No
period in the history of western intellectual life is closer to the present
in its contributions to the study of language than the later middle ages.
The aim of this class is to introduce students to discussions of central
topics (by figures such as Ockham and Buridan) and their relation to
current views. Both periods take a compositional approach wherein more
complex language/sentences are treated in terms of their simpler component
parts.
This is an indispensable theme of authors such as Chomsky and Davidson.
These sentences were considered in works on philosophical logic and also in
works called Sophismata (The study of sophisms/puzzles/paradoxes.).
The method of the latter was to examine opposing sides of a question.
Hamlet fresh from a medieval university was using this method when he posed
and examined answers to the question: ‘To be or not to
be?’.Compositionality requires that one starts with simple singular
sentences such ‘Socrates is human’ and proceeds to more complex ones
constructed from them. These are treated in terms of a semantical version
of Aristotle’s correspondence theory of truth.
A current version is found in Alfred Tarski’s famous paper and is the basis
for model theoretic semantical approaches to language (found in texts such
as Cherchia and Ginet’s Meaning and Grammar-An Introduction to Semantics).
One takes up problematic negative sentences such as ‘That chimera does not
exist’. This is the topic of negative existentials. It is also dealt with
in works by many current authors, e.g., Meinong, Bertrand Russell, Quine,
etc. From there one goes on to general sentences and the treatment of
quantifiers, such as ‘All’ and ‘some’. This material is dealt with in current
writers such as Quine, Barcan Marcus and Kripke. After that modal sentences
and what Bertrand Russell called propositional attitudes.
Here is a variation of a sophism: You believe the object coming to you
covered in a donkey’s skin is a donkey. The object coming to you is your
father. So you believe your father is a donkey. This sophism
and others deal with the same question posed by Frege’s morning
star-evening star case. Last but not
least are discussions of the Liar’s Paradox: [This sentence is false].
Which paradoxically if true, is false and if false, is true. One treatment
is known today as ‘The Buridan Peirce solution’ crediting Charles Saunders
Peirce for reviving a theme from John Buridan.
Course requirements: class participation, presentation, and a 15-20pp
paper.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MSCP
80500
|
The
Passion/The Body/The Christ
|
|
|
Monday, 4:15-6:15 p.m., Room TBA., 3 credits [90403]
|
|
|
Professor Michael Sargent
Cross listed with ENGL 80700
|
|
|
In
this course, we will look at one of the most remarkable forms of the
material culture of spirituality in the later middle ages: the mapping of
the passion of Christ and its sacramental simulacrum onto the body of the
devout believer.
Using theoretical/critical approaches drawing upon gender and film theory
and the social sciences, we will talk about the cultural work that various
“texts of the passion” performed. We will read and discuss works of guided
meditation, narratives of mystical trance and ecstatic performance of the
arrest, torture and crucifixion, and the public re-enactment of the passion
in civic drama – as well as the parallel experience of public torture and
execution.
The majority of the writings that we will be studying will be in Middle
English, but most are available in modern English versions as well – as
well as in the original continental languages in which some of them were
composed.
The texts that I am thinking of including are the lives of three Belgian
beguine mystics (Elizabeth of Spalbeek, Christina mirabilis and Marie
d’Oignies), the meditations on the passion and the eucharist from Nicholas
Love’s Mirror of the Blessed Life of
Jesus Christ, selections from the writings of Julian of Norwich and
Margery Kempe and from the late-medieval English Corpus Christi plays, as
well as the abjected mirror-image of the passion in such blood-libel texts
as Chaucer’s “Prioress’ Tale” and the Croxton Play of the Sacrament.
A good time will be had by all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ART
71100
|
Art
& Architecture of Spain: Middle
Ages-Renaissance
|
|
|
Tuesday, 4:15-6:15 p.m., 3 credits [90439]
|
|
|
Professor Jerrilyn Dodds
Prerequisite:
Open to Art History students only.
Permission of instructor and executive officer required for all others.
|
|
|
This
course will explore the diverse, unique artistic interactions of Spain in
the Medieval and Renaissance periods. It will include art and architecture
that grows from both Christian and Islamic rules, and put particular
emphasis on hybrid traditions.
These arts will be explored against the backdrop of a new historiography
for Renaissance Spain that sees the contribution of this diverse and plural
past in the character and development of Spain as a nation state, and in
the artistic values it bequeaths to Baroque and to the New World.
Topics
Include
Roman and Visigothic Arts
The Umayyads in Cordoba and
"The Ornament of the World"
The Kingdom of Leon, the
Pilgrimage to Santiagoand the Creation of Spanish Romanesque
Intimacy and Desire: Poetry
and the Arts of the Taifa Kings
Synagogue, Mosque and Church
in a Cosmopolitan Age
The Arts of: The Almohads and
the Papacy
Mudejar Arts: Spanish
Identity; Plural Identity
Murcia and the birth of
Castillian Colonialism
Seville: A Capital through
Time
Gothic Painting in the Kingdom
of Aragon
The Alhambra in Granada and
changing meaning ofa monument: The Alhambra under the Catholic Kings and
Carlos V
Early Isabelline Painting:
Portraits of Spain, and of Spaniards
El Escorial and Spanish
Classicisms
Painting and Sculpture of
'Modern Devotion':
The Plateresque: 'Romano' vs 'Morisco'
Preliminary
Readings:
Maria Rosa Menocal, The Ornament of the World: How Muslims,
Jews, and Christians Created a Culture of Tolerance in Medieval Spain,
2003.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C L
80101
|
Jewish-Christian Encounters Middle
Ages-Present
|
|
|
Thursday, 3:30-6:10 p.m., NYU Room TBA, 4 credits [90432]
|
|
|
Professor Javitch
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C L
80103
|
Dante's
Prose Works
|
|
|
Wednesday, 3:30 – 5:10 p.m., NYU Room TBA, 4 credits
[90437]
|
|
|
Professor Ardizzone
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ENGL
70700
|
Literature
& Identity in Medieval Britain
|
|
|
Friday, 11:45 a.m. – 1:45 p.m., Room TBA, 2/4 credits [90505]
|
|
|
Professor Gordon Whatley
|
|
|
The
course selects works both “canonical” (the kind we are often required to
teach in undergraduate surveys) and non-canonical, from the broad range of
vernacular medieval British literature (not all of which is “English”), and
will focus on the literary construction of idealized religious and secular
human identities (with some attention to beasts, birds and monsters).
Some attention will be given to manuscript contexts. Works from the Old
English period will include the “heroic” verse narratives Beowulf, Genesis
B (the fall of Lucifer, Adam & Eve), Judith (a biblical
“apocryphon” featuring the Hebrew heroine’s decapitation of an Assyrian
warlord, Holofernes); and Ælfric’s rhythmic prose legends of the virginal
Saint Agnes and King Edmund.
From the late 12th-early 13th century, when England’s
dominant literary language was French, we will encounter a group of texts
written by or about women and ostensibly for women: Old French lais by the
mysterious Marie de France (Guigemar, Lanval, Bisclavret,
Yonec), the Barking nun Clemence’s Anglo-Norman “Life of Saint
Katherine,” alongside the early Middle English treatise on Holy
Maidenhood (“Letter on Virginity”) and the martyr’s legend of Seinte
Margarete.
Two further groups of texts from the later Middle English period emphasize
male, if not always “masculine,” identities. Chaucer’s Knight’s Tale, and
the anonymous Sir Gawain and the Green Knight (both late 14th
century), well-known today, will be read in relation to one another and
against more marginal romances such as Sir Orfeo and Amis and
Amiloun (early 14th c.).
These secular productions will be juxtaposed with “popular” Christian
legends such as those of Saint George (England’s patron saint) and Saint
Francis of Assisi (“the last Christian”) from the South English
Legendary (late 13th c.) and the visionary subjectivities of
Langland’s Piers Plowman and Juliana of Norwich’s Showings.
Most of the course readings will be available in modern translations, but
there will be opportunities for the specialist or afficionado to
work also with the original versions; everyone will be expected to handle
Chaucer’s English (for which there are numerous online aids).
Students will report regularly on recent critical scholarship, and will be
encouraged to research issues of textuality, intertextuality, and
historicism, or to explore and test theoretical models for further
understanding of the course readings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PHIL
77800
|
Greco-Roman
Ethics/Infl Christianity GC
|
|
|
Tuesday
& Thursday, 11:45 a.m.- 1:45 p.m., Room TBA, 4 credits [90392]
Course given the first 7 weeks of the semester
|
|
|
Professor
Sorabji
Begins September 11, 2007 Ends October 25,
2007 Registration limited to 12 Cross-listed with Classics
|
|
|
A
set of translations in the region of 100 pages will be prepared as required
reading for the course and handed out at the beginning.
The reading below, ordered for library reserve and partly available
on-line, follows the descriptions of the topics, and is to help with the
two papers due, a short paper on Oct 1st on the first topic, Conscience and
a term paper on Oct 21st on any of the topics.
The term paper may be on a new topic or a substantial development of the
short paper. The first half of the course will be on topic 1: Conscience.
The second half will be on Will, which is the seat of conscience according
to Bonaventure, while the misnamed weakness of will in Aristotle is treated
by Aquinas as a model of how conscience can go wrong.
The topic of Will brings in the Struggle against Temptation and Freedom
from emotion, and so I have broken up the description of topic 2 into four
inter-related topics.
A more complete course description is available at http://web.gc.cuny.edu/philosophy/courses/07-08_fall_sorabji.pdf
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P SC
70100
|
Ancient
& Medieval Political Thought
|
|
|
Tuesday,
6:30-8:30 p.m., Room TBA, 3 credits [90279]
|
|
|
Professor
Wallach
|
|
|
Prerequisite: Permission of instructor required for
those not enrolled in the Political Science Program.
|
|
|
This
course consists of interpretive analysis of selected, major texts that fall
within the conventional category of "ancient and medieval political
thought" with an eye toward the theoretical subject of political
ethics.
The works from the "ancient" world may also be works of history,
drama, literary dialectic, rhetoric, and philosophy(e.g., works by
Thucydides, Euripides, Plato, Aristotle, Cicero, and Augustine), while the
works from the "medieval" world will have distinctly
"religious" dimensions as well (e.g., works by Al-Farabi,
Maimonides, and Aquinas).
Selections will be made so as to enable serious examination of
philosophical and political principles found in various texts as well as
the constitutive role of the authors' contexts in the production of their
texts and principles.
We will also attend to major, modern (post-War to contemporary)
interpretations and appropriations of ancient and medieval ideas for
contemporary political theory--such as work by Strauss,Arendt, MacIntyre,
Nussbaum, Agamben, and Ranciere
|
|
|
|
|
Past schedules:
|
Spring 2007; Fall 2006; Spring 2006; Fall 2005; Spring 2005;Fall 2004;Spring 2004;Fall 2003; Spring 2003; Fall 2002; Spring 2002; Fall 2001; Spring 2001
|
TOP
|