The first two will normally be taken concurrently, as will the
second pair of courses, for which the first pair will be prerequisite.
On completing these four courses, students will take Educational
Policy.
In addition to the core courses there are also two required
one credit core
colloquium seminars, one in each of the first two semesters of
student's work in the program.
The core courses are unified by two themes that run through them
all: the interdependence of curricular and policy issues, and the
connections between research methodology and fundamental questions of
the nature and reliability of knowledge in the human sciences. All
courses address issues of research methodology; all include cultural,
historical, and political dimensions of inquiry. One course in each of
the first two pairs (Pedagogy and the Urban Classroom and Historical
Contexts) of Urban Education provides specific case-study contexts
(historical examples and participant observation in urban schools,
respectively) for the examination of philosophical (Pedagogy and the
Urban Classroom) and methodological (Logics of Inquiry) issues in the
paired courses. Educational Policy serves as a capstone course,
building on the learning and experiences of the prior four courses to
help students understand the complex multiple considerations needed in
policy analysis research as well as the impact of policy on curricular
and instructional issues.
By taking the core courses as cohort groups, students with diverse
backgrounds and intended areas of specialization will begin the
process of collaborative inquiry that is central to the structure of
this program. At every stage of their doctoral studies, students will
learn to articulate their research questions, procedures, and outcomes
with those of other students approaching related problems from
different perspectives.
For each core course we present a brief course description and a
fuller statement of the designer's rationale for the course. The links
from each course title lead to more details. Note that the actual
course may vary from the proposed outline in its details.
Core 1: Pedagogy
and the Urban Classroom
(3 credits; 30 hours plus conferences; 15-20 students per offering)
Course Description
This course examines the relationships through which knowledge is
constructed and communicated in urban schools. It approaches pedagogy
as a set of relationships among teachers and students mediated by
culture, history, learning theories, assumptions about childhood and
adulthood, and assumptions about knowledge and ignorance. Students
will study pedagogical interactions in schools and the forms that
knowledge assumes in the curriculum in discourse, activities, texts,
materials, and technology. Students will also be asked to consider the
ways that pedagogy is shaped by institutional culture and professional
governance. Resources from cultural anthropology and comparative
education will be studied to frame contemporary practice as particular
versions of what is possible.
Rationale
It is important to view the pedagogies of the urban classroom
through a number of frames to understand the roots of current
practice. Researchers are often asked to appraise methods of
instruction without having any sense of the historical influences and
cultural traditions that sustain these practices, giving them
authority and persuasion in the minds of teachers, students, and their
families. It is important as well to introduce students to analytic
frames through which the act of teaching may be viewed, such as:
phenomenology, discourse analysis, cultural anthropology, object
relations theory, cognitive science, intellectual history,
epistemology, and social reproduction theory. This course will follow
Pedagogy and the Urban Classroom and Historical Contexts of Urban
Education and will provide concrete situations for
analysis though field studies that will be shared with Logics
of Inquiry. By bringing a cohort of students to the analysis of a
common problem in a school setting, we will prepare students for the
collaborative work that they will do in their area seminars and
dissertation research teams.
Core 2: The
Historical Contexts of Urban Education
(3 credits; 30 hours plus conferences; 15-20 students per offering)
Course Description
This course will explore the emergence and transformation of urban
educational institutions--public and private, inclusive and selective,
fee-paying and free, religious and secular--out of the dynamic
interplay of individual, group, and larger scale intellectual, social,
political, and economic factors. Students will study the formation of
social identities in the history of education, specifically race,
class, gender, ethnicity, and religion, and the relationship of
identify formation to current issues in education. The history of the
politics of education also will be studied, especially as politics
relates to defining educational mission, determining resources,
including or excluding individuals and groups, providing equity of
educational opportunity, and encouraging community participation in
establishing and maintaining schools.
The course will develop the concepts and skills of historiographic
research through an examination of prevailing concepts of education
and schooling, schooling and identity formation, concepts of childhood
and youth, perceived missions of schooling, alternative school
structures and governance, available technologies, teacher recruitment
and student enrollments, contemporary pedagogies and curricula, and
the resulting educational institutions and programs that emerge at a
given historical moment.
Rationale
Contemporary students of urban education need to be aware of the
antecedents of the issues they now confront. As David Tyack has
argued, current reformers both within and outside of the educational
establishment act as if "history was something to be overcome, not a
source of insight." Policy analysts need to be aware of the context
(political, social, and economic) and actual alternatives that
confronted institution-builders and decision-makers in the past;
whether conscious decisions were made or if events dictated policy;
and, if conscious choices were made, which alternatives were selected,
which rejected, and which never seen. Analysts also must determine if
and how policies were implemented and what the outcomes were, intended
as well as unintended. Curriculum theorists need to be able to explore
the past to see how knowledge was perceived, valued, transmitted,
received, and validated within the crucible of educational
institutions, and the dynamics that drove changes over time.
Historical Contexts is paired with Pedagogy and the Urban Classroom in the first semester in order that
students not only gain the historical and philosophical depth needed
for serious research study in urban education but also have the
opportunity to refer to actual historical examples when discussing
philosophical controversies and perspectives.
Core 3: Logics
of Inquiry
(3 credits; 30 hours plus conferences; 15-20 students per offering)
Course Description
Based on participant observation in urban schools, students will
carry out small-scale projects within which they will begin to
formulate research issues and questions, produce sample data
collections, and consider alternative approaches to the analysis of
these collections. By reading exemplary research studies in education
and classic essays on the dilemmas of research methodology in the
social and human sciences, students will advance their understanding
of how to design and justify complementary combinations of research
methods for prospective studies.
Rationale
This course will help students develop the sophisticated
understanding of methodological issues and alternatives needed to
synthesize appropriate research methods for the dissertation studies
they will eventually undertake. Building on discussions of the grounds
of practical and theoretical knowledge of Pedagogy in the Urban
Classroom and the introduction to historical method in Historical
Contexts of Urban Education, students will
continue the process of developing critical judgment regarding the
choice and justification of research strategies. This process will
continue in subsequent courses in quantitative research methods
(courses offered by CUNY doctoral programs; see Appendix B) and in
specialized methods of other kinds from partner disciplines such as
Sociology, Anthropology, Linguistics, History, Philosophy, etc.,
appropriate to the research interests of individual students. It is
assumed that these students will already have taken at least one prior
research methods course on the master's degree level, which will have
included some discussion of elementary quantitative methods.
Exemplary research studies using and combining approaches such as
ethnographic, interview-based, discourse-analytic, case-study,
semiotic, phenomenological, historical, demographic, and
quasi-experimental methods will offer opportunities for critical
examination of their assumptions, uses, and limitations in curriculum
and policy research. These studies will be read and discussed
alongside thoughtful and classic critical essays on the methodological
dilemmas faced by researchers in the social and human sciences. The
aim will be to enable students to go on to other courses that deal
with research methodology in various disciplines well-prepared with
critical questions and a sense of what is ultimately at stake in the
choice of research methods. Because the logic of quantitative and
quasi-experimental methods is an integral part of other courses, at
least one of which all students will be required to take, this course
will focus on the logics of inquiry implicit in other frequently used
methods in the field.
Core 4: The
Structure of Social Knowledge
(3 credits; 30 hours plus conferences; 15-20 students per offering)
Course Description
In this course students will examine the responsibility of schools,
curricula, and pedagogy to address issues of the epistemological
foundations of knowledge and the economic, social, and political
conditions for the production, legitimation, and dissemination of
knowledge. Relationships among knowledge, interest, and agendas for
action, as well as the changing nature of curricular knowledge in
relation to changes in the workplace and broader cultural and economic
developments ,will be considered.
Rationale
This course addresses two closely related issues: (1) What do we
know and how do we know what we know? (2) What are the basic
determinants of legitimate and nonlegitimate knowledge? It draws on
philosophy, anthropology, sociology, economics and history to answer
these questions.
The course will survey various answers to the question, "How do we
know?" including Descartes' notion that Mind underlies knowing; Hume's
challenge to Descartes' rationalism, insisting that knowledge refers
not to a world independent of consciousness but that consciousness
produces and organizes the world more or less according to
contextually derived needs and desires; Vico's idea, later developed
by Marx and Dewey, that we know the world because we make it; and
Kant's attempt to reconcile Descartes' idea of the fissure between
mind and body by invoking scientific method as the way in which an
otherwise unknowable world may be apprehended.
A core issue under this heading is, "What is scientific method?"
Approaches to this question cover a range: the theory that only those
propositions that may be refuted by means of rigorous procedures can
be considered scientifically valid; rationalist theories that invoke
logic as the core science; evolutionary theories holding that we know
things by understanding their development; the view that
self-understanding is the means by which we know.
The second major issue in the course concerns the economic, social
and political conditions for the production and dissemination of
knowledge. It considers power and human interest as constitutive of
knowledge. The issues of power and interest are particularly salient
to the question of what is legitimate and what is illegitimate
knowledge.
Core 5:
Educational Policy
(3 credits; 30 hours plus conferences; 15-20 students per offering)
Course Description
This course will study educational policies and subsequent
implementation as the intended and unintended consequences of many
processes: ideological, social, judicial, scientific, political, and
economic. Within the context of each issue, potential policy
alternatives will be identified and actual policy and implementation
decisions studied. Students will learn to use relevant concepts and
methodologies from the social and behavioral sciences to analyze
issues critically, including appropriate quantitative and qualitative
methods.
Case studies of real-world policies and practical outcomes will be
studied to explicate within a specific temporal and political context
complex urban educational problems. Through these cases students will
learn the many methodologies, including cost-benefit, historical, and
comparative, that must be brought to bear in the study and resolution
of educational problems. Case studies will deal with such issues as
school choice, educational equity and opportunity, curriculum and
standards, staffing and staff unionization, school-based budgeting and
decision-making, school size and organizational structure, and the
allocation of authority in school systems as reflected in school and
system governance. The course will include analysis of the processes
of public policy-making and implementation; team fieldwork on policy
problems, especially those involving the relationship between policy
and power; seminars with education policy-makers; and an internship in
public or private agencies connected to the field of education.
Rationale
Learning to analyze and interpret education policy issues is
essential for leaders to make effective policy decisions. They also
must be able to examine alternative paradigms as well as interpret
specific policies. They must be able to see policy issues within a
broad sociopolitical context to understand how policies are
intentionally or unintentionally arrived at, and to comprehend links
between policies and outcomes.
This course will approach issues of educational policy in terms of
paradigms and paradigm shifts. Policy-makers must be able to examine
alternative paradigms as well as interpret specific policies. A policy
paradigm involves clusters of assumptions and fundamental approaches
underlying the ways policy-makers and analysts address goals,
processes, and outcomes of educational policy. Improving education may
require major paradigm shifts. Such decisions entail significant
shifts in the organization of images, the culture of institutions,
communities and social structures. Anthropologist Clifford Geertz
identifies these as "symbolic sources of illumination," which we use
"to put a construction upon events, to orient ourselves to the ongoing
course of experienced things." These sources are directly related to a
society's centers of power that are frequently competing or
conflicting.
Policy studies, therefore, must be embedded in considerations that
lead to understanding the relationships between and among cultures,
power, policy, and practices. They must address alternative
educational goals related to culture and power as much as methods
appropriate to their realization. This course will proceed on the
assumption that these are open questions, the answers for which are
not always present.
Whether the result of intentional or unintentional processes, or of
active or passive decision-making, policies need to be implemented. A
policy once formulated may never be implemented or, if implemented,
may be carried out in a manner that undermines or contradicts that
self-same policy. Hence, connections between policy and practice must
be closely examined within the same field of forces appropriate to the
examination of policy-making itself.
This core course continues to develop the twin themes of earlier
core courses: the integral relationship between curriculum development
and educational policy-making, and the construction and communication
of knowledge and how these relate to issues of schooling. The course
treats education in a broad context. It includes traditional schools
as well as other institutions that offer instruction, and it includes
all areas of public policy that have an impact on children and
schooling, not just explicitly educational policy.